People are becoming used to how quickly AI technology improves.
Breakneck doesn’t even seem adequate to explain the scale of the movements. Because it isn’t just about the rate of change – even the rate of change of the rate of change is accelerating ... and the result is exponential progress.
It only takes a quick look at Veo 3 to realize it represents a significant breakthrough in delivering astonishingly realistic videos.
I’m only including two examples here ... but I went down the rabbit hole and came away very impressed.
via Jerrod Lew
An example of this comes from Google’s new AI filmmaking tool, Flow.
What Is Flow?
How Does It Work?
Why Is This Cool?
It is becoming easier for almost anyone to create the type of content that only a specialist could produce before. The tool makes it easy in these three ways.
-
Consistent: The videos stick together well, so your story doesn’t jump around confusingly.
-
Seamless: It’s easy to add or change things without breaking the flow.
-
Cinematic: The videos look high-quality — like something you’d see on TV or in theaters.
If you want to play with it, it’s available to Google Ultra subscribers through the Gemini app and Google Labs.
Ok, but what can it do?
Redefining “Real”
To set the stage, imagine you’re watching a video of a person talking. Typically, you think, “This is real — someone actually stood in front of a camera and spoke.” But now computers can make a video that looks and sounds so real, you can’t tell it’s fake.
Hashem Al-Ghaili via X
I predict you will see a massive influx of AI-generated content flooding social media using tools like this.
The Rise of AI Art and Its Implications
The last time I talked about AI Art specifically was in 2022 when Dall-E was just gaining steam. Before that, it was 2019, when AI self-portraits were going viral.
On both occasions, it still felt like the relative infancy of the technology. I compared it to VR getting another 15 minutes of fame.
The images at the time weren’t fantastic, but it was a massive step in AI’s ability to understand and translate text into a coherent graphic response. The algorithms still didn’t really “understand” the meaning of images the way we do, and they were guessing based on what they had seen before - which was much less than today’s algorithms have seen. They were also much worse at interpreting images. As such, when you tried to use AI to recreate an image, there were a lot of hallucinations. The algorithms were essentially a brute-force application of math masquerading as intelligence.
Fortunately, AI imagery has come a long way since then. However, with that improvement comes more ethical concerns.
The rise of AI-generated art has sparked a complex and ongoing ethical debate, with compelling arguments on both sides. At the heart of the discussion lies the question of authorship, originality, and the impact of automation on human creativity and labor.
Proponents of AI art argue that it represents a powerful extension of human imagination. Just as past innovations—such as photography, digital editing, or sampling in music—were initially met with skepticism, Advocates argue AI-generated art is simply the next evolution in the artistic toolkit, and it democratizes access to artmaking. As a result, those with less skill - or time - can explore new styles, generate concepts, and be creative in a new form. To this end, they see AI not as a threat but as a collaborator—another brush or chisel in an artist’s hand.
However, critics raise concerns about the ethical implications of AI art, particularly in how these models are trained. Many AI systems are built on vast datasets scraped from the internet, including artwork by human creators who were neither consulted nor compensated, leading to accusations of IP theft. Moreover, they argue it sets a dangerous precedent where creative works can be replicated and commodified without consent or attribution. Lastly, on the idea of democratization, they would argue that art is already accessible to all and that people should be willing to explore skills not only to be good at them but to enjoy them.
The most recent trend has been a great example of this argument. The launch of OpenAI’s new image generator, powered by GPT-4, has empowered users to transform their photos into various famous media themes - like Renaissance paintings or Studio Ghibli anime images - which ironically goes against the ethos of Studio Ghibli and Hayao Miyazaki. The studio is known for its commitment to the craft, with carefully animated and hand-drawn scenes. Their films are known for glorifying nature and living in harmony with it. Miyazaki also believes that AI art is disrespectful to the “life” found in human-created art.
I’m a massive fan of AI - and even AI art ... but as the technology continues to evolve, society must grapple with how to integrate these tools in ways that honor both progress and the rights of the artists (and people) whose work—and livelihoods—may be at stake.
What do you think?
Posted at 01:07 AM in Art, Business, Current Affairs, Film, Gadgets, Games, Ideas, Just for Fun, Market Commentary, Movies, Music, Pictures, Science, Web/Tech | Permalink | Comments (0)
Reblog (0)