In general, as technology advances, it is human nature to get excited about the possibilities and to get disappointed when those expectations aren't met.
At its core, the Hype Cycle tells us where in the product's timeline we are, and how long it will take the technology to hit maturity. It attempts to tell us which technologies will survive the hype and have the potential to become a part of our daily life.
Gartner's Hype Cycle Report is one of my favorites. It is a considered analysis of market excitement, maturity, and the benefit of various technologies. It aggregates data and distills more than 2,000 technologies into a succinct and contextually understandable snapshot of where various emerging technologies sit in their hype cycle.
Peak of Inflated Expectations (Success stories through early publicity),
Trough of Disillusionment (waning interest),
Slope of Enlightenment (2nd & 3rd generation products appear), and
Plateau of Productivity (Mainstream adoption starts).
Understanding this hype cycle framework enables you to ask important questions like "How will these technologies impact my business?" and "Which technologies can I trust to stay relevant in 5 years?"
Another methodology uses frequency analysis to identify the "most hyped" concepts and technologies.
VisualCapitalist recently put together an infographic highlighting the most hyped technologies of each year. They call it the "Peak of Inflated Expectations".
2017 - Virtual Assistants, Connected Home, Deep Learning
2018 - Biochips, Digital Twin, Deep Neural Networks
2019* - 5G, AI PaaS, Graph Analytics *Missing from the infographic, but updated by Gartner
As we take our smartphones for granted, it's hard to imagine bluetooth, wireless web, or e-book readers as emerging technologies at this point - but at a time, the lightbulb was an emerging technology.
It's also interesting to look at which technologies peaked in a hype cycle, or which now popular technologies don't show up on this list. Despite Virtual Reality being around since the 80's, I expected to see it on this list.
Cryptocurrencies, "smart homes", and several older examples are fizzling or burnt out - but that doesn't mean they won't have resurgences.
As a reminder, the hype cycle and the innovation/adoption cycle are often on very different time scales. It's very possible that technologies from the early 2000s may still have their heyday.
What are you surprised wasn't on the list? And, what do you think is about to get added?
I went to a conference in Phoenix with my son Zach last week. While there, he noticed something interesting ... Lyft is testing Alphabet's Waymo autonomous driving service live on the streets.
Regardless of concerns about the future of the gig economy – this is a glimpse into our not-to-distant future.
Here's what they say about it.
I had to leave early to catch a flight, so my son decided to use Lyft to get around. He accepted the Waymo terms, but didn't get a Waymo vehicle. Still, I thought this was cool.
There will likely soon be a tipping point where autonomous vehicles proliferate. Even though we are not "there" yet ... the progress is obvious and the "quickening" is happening.
Meanwhile, examples of innovation and exponential technology successes and adoption are all around us.
Nature (and common sense) reminds us that equilibrium is important. For example, when you exercise too much you get injured, when you drink too much water you get poisoned, etc.
This concept applies almost everywhere.
It's why diversification is so important in portfolio construction theory.
Or, why you don't want to put all your eggs in one basket (concentrating your risk).
And, my favorite, it's also why you shouldn't only eat vegetables.
A related nugget of wisdom from the extreme ... too much of a good thing is a bad thing.
The concept of "Debt" can be confusing to a layman. Most people understand what it means when they take on debt with a local bank, but it can be harder to understand the role debt plays in global economics.
Compounding the confusion, the implications of debt change on a macro level.
Many worry that our "excessive" government debt levels impact economic stability, the strength of our currency, and unemployment. The national debt can only be reduced through five mechanisms: increased taxation, reduced spending, debt restructuring, monetization of the debt, or default.
The idea behind our current global debt structure is that if two nations are mutually obligated and dependent on each other, they are less likely to go to war. And that has held relatively true so far. Of course, it's not a perfect system, and it can break down, but as yet, it's working compared to previous systems such as the balance of power.
In some ways, it's fake money, so paying off our debts seems insurmountable. Yet, our economy is reliable so we're allowed to continue borrowing. Debt is also an important part of the economic machine - it can be argued that we wouldn't have money without debt.
Ray Dalio created a simple (but not simplistic) and relatively easy to follow 30 minute animated video that answers the question, "How does the economy really work?" Click to watch.
So it makes sense that the amount of debt is also increasing with the size of the money supply required to conduct all the transactions in the global economy.
The U.S. tops the list with debt to GDP at 104.3% and almost $22 Trillion in debt, but is dwarfed by #2 Japan's debt to GDP rate of 237.1%.
Meanwhle, China has increased its indebtedness by $2 trillion in the last two years.
The market is not the economy. Meaning, the performance of markets is not necessarily linked to the performance of the economy (and the converse is true as well). Even though you may be more interested in trading, economics is still important to understand and follow.
If one thing is clear, it's that 2020 will be an interesting year for markets and the economy.
There is a lot of opportunity in crisis and chaos.
On January 2nd, 2020, after many years of hard work, we launched the Capitalogix Absolute Return Fund.
It’s been a long and hard road ... but also a labor of love.
On a related note, I’ve talked about moonshots, playing a different game, and getting comfortable being uncomfortable. These themes come up because they define what we do at Capitalogix and what was necessary to create the technology platform that runs the fund.
Speaking of getting comfortable being uncomfortable, I spent the last week on a family cruise through the Caribbean.
We celebrated many important events including my mother’s 80th birthday, my sister’s 50th birthday, and Jennifer and my 12th wedding anniversary.
We happened to be in Grand Cayman on January 2nd, the day fund launched.
I had a chance to stop by Walker’s (our fund lawyers) to commemorate the day with them as well.
In fact, our largest growth came on the backs of the Great Depression and WW2 ... it makes sense, but it's a reminder of resiliency.
Looking at 2019, we've seen volatility, fear, uncertainty - but we've also seen a banner year for the S&P 500, and continued GDP growth.
According to visual capitalist, the key sectors for growth this year were semiconductors, credit services, aerospace/defense, electornic equipment, and diversified machinery. Oil, wireless communications, foreign banks, apparel, and foreign telecoms took a hit.
I share these images, not to say we're invincible, or that growth will continue forever, but to say that as we start the new year it's important to be optimistic and keep an eye on what's possible, not what obstacles we may face along the way.
On Wednesday, Trump became the third U.S. president in history to be impeached. The Democratic-led House of Representatives passed charges against him for "abuse of power" and "obstruction of Congress."
Wednesday was also the day that I learned many of my friends don't understand the impeachment process. Trump has not been removed from office, and with the vote to remove him coming from the Senate (assuming that the parties will vote along lines) it seems unlikely he will be removed.
While impeachment still matters - it's essentially a demerit. He's been called to the principal's office - but he hasn't been expelled, and he's still allowed to finish the year and apply for next year. He'll likely finish his first term, and has a chance for a second term.
So why go through with the process?
Democrats hope to convince "moderate" Republicans to vote against party lines, and Republicans believe this is a farce/smear campaign that will only solidify support for Trump and embolden their base.
Currently, it feels like Nancy Pelosi is going through the motions just to say she went through them.
It's a seemingly futile exercise in partisan politics ... but it will take until the results of the upcoming Presidential election to truly decide.
Regardless, the market currently doesn't care ... at all.
By the end of Wednesday's regular session, equities had weakened slightly, but all major indexes were trading near all-time highs.
It makes sense. Republicans and Democrats voted along party lines, and they'll do the same in the Senate. So, there's little reason for the market to worry.
Even if some Republicans voted against party lines, the vote needs a 2/3 majority to pass.
Markets respond to fear and excitement - and while there's political grandstanding on both sides, nothing really has happened. Even if Trump were removed, Pence would remain a supporter of Trump's policies.
In the long-term, this raises questions about who will govern us in the future, what policies will be passed, etc... All things that will influence the market.
Time will tell what the results will be, but it feels like we're safe from major political news until Super Tuesday in March.
In my office, there's a series of artwork I had commissioned from GapingVoid. One important piece states that "wisdom comes from finer distinctions".
The more nuance you can capture, from less, the better – think Sherlock Holmes's perceptiveness compared to a normal police officer or detective. He noticed things others didn't and came to conclusions that others couldn't.
The best detective isn't necessarily the one who looked at the most stuff. It might be the one that was clever enough to ignore the wrong stuff (which led to being able to discern the right answer in less time).
The same concept applies to AI and data. More isn't always better.
The evolution of mastery requires gaining more from a dataset.
Don't get me wrong - data is a precious commodity, and more (and different) data is often better - but it means much less when you're not using it right.
More Data = Less Visibility
We're living in the best era (so far) but people are increasingly frustrated and unhappy. They're less happy in their relationships, they're less happy in their jobs, and they're more depressed than recent generations.
Comparison is the Thief of Joy
It's too easy to say it's because they're "snowflakes", but it makes sense. They're surrounded by people yet have less meaningful connections due to so much of it being "online". They see everyone's highlight reels and feel like they can't live up. They're inundated with media from all directions and they have infinite options in our hyperconnected society.
Data is exhausting. Choice is exhausting. It's the reason willpower doesn't work, and it creates anxiety and lack of movement.
It's the same with data - the more data an AI has to sift through the harder is to separate the signal from the noise. It's why daily optimization is harder than monthly optimization.
That doesn't mean that there's not value in more data (or in daily optimization) - but it means you need to be calculated about it.
It needs to be built on solving the right problem.
We Don't Have More Problems Than Ever, We Have More Complex Problems
As a society, we've solved so many of the low hanging fruit that we're having to solve more complicated problems. From a theory of constraints viewpoint, we've fixed a lot of life's bottlenecks and we're now dealing with the real underlying issues.
Solving for the "local optima" is fixing a symptom - we have to look for the global optima and solve for the disease.
Today, I'd rather have a 10-layer algorithm than an algorithm that looks at 10 datasets ... creating finer distinctions.
Sparse Data + Agile Decision Engine = Better Outcomes
You'll get a better outcome by focusing on answering the right question with the right datasets than by throwing a mountain of data at a random neural net.
Scale matters, but is secondary. It's built on the back of finer distinctions.
The more noise you can remove before feeding information to an algorithm the better.
It seems simple - but that's the game, and it's the one most aren't playing.
The Most Hyped Technologies of The 2000s
The Hype Cycle provides the raw material for some of my favorite posts every year.
In general, as technology advances, it is human nature to get excited about the possibilities and to get disappointed when those expectations aren't met.
At its core, the Hype Cycle tells us where in the product's timeline we are, and how long it will take the technology to hit maturity. It attempts to tell us which technologies will survive the hype and have the potential to become a part of our daily life.
Gartner's Hype Cycle Report is one of my favorites. It is a considered analysis of market excitement, maturity, and the benefit of various technologies. It aggregates data and distills more than 2,000 technologies into a succinct and contextually understandable snapshot of where various emerging technologies sit in their hype cycle.
Here are the five regions of Gartner's Hype Cycle framework:
Understanding this hype cycle framework enables you to ask important questions like "How will these technologies impact my business?" and "Which technologies can I trust to stay relevant in 5 years?"
Another methodology uses frequency analysis to identify the "most hyped" concepts and technologies.
VisualCapitalist recently put together an infographic highlighting the most hyped technologies of each year. They call it the "Peak of Inflated Expectations".
Here's a Summary of the most hyped technologies, by year, since 2000.
*Missing from the infographic, but updated by Gartner
As we take our smartphones for granted, it's hard to imagine bluetooth, wireless web, or e-book readers as emerging technologies at this point - but at a time, the lightbulb was an emerging technology.
It's also interesting to look at which technologies peaked in a hype cycle, or which now popular technologies don't show up on this list. Despite Virtual Reality being around since the 80's, I expected to see it on this list.
Cryptocurrencies, "smart homes", and several older examples are fizzling or burnt out - but that doesn't mean they won't have resurgences.
As a reminder, the hype cycle and the innovation/adoption cycle are often on very different time scales. It's very possible that technologies from the early 2000s may still have their heyday.
What are you surprised wasn't on the list? And, what do you think is about to get added?
Posted at 12:48 PM in Business, Current Affairs, Gadgets, Ideas, Market Commentary, Science, Trading Tools, Web/Tech | Permalink | Comments (0)
Reblog (0)