Markets are not the economy, but it's still important to understand and follow economics.
One of the unfortunate "trends" of 2020 was the increase in debt at various levels. Now, debt can be a good thing ... it greases the international wheels and can be an important part of long-term financial plans for countries (in the same way you or I might use it.)
But too much of a good thing is a bad thing, and doing that math gets pretty complicated on the national level.
To help put it in perspective, I want to look at the U.S. debt on different scales.
First, you can look at this US Debt Clock for a staggering interactive visualization of the inflows and outflows in America. Click the image to watch it update in real-time. I encourage you to look at some of the components tracked. It made me think about our future differently.
via US Debt Clock (4/9/21)
The U.S. has a GDP of about $22 Trillion and our national debt is currently over $28 Trillion, but our net worth is still approximately $120 trillion.
For more perspective:
- The global economy has hugely increased in size in the last 50 years as developing nations prosper. The average global GDP per capita has gone from ~$1000 to over $10,000 in my lifetime.
- The U.S. has the largest percentage of the world's debt, but Japan has the worst debt-to-GDP rate at over 224% (compared to America's approximately 127%)
- During 2020, debt held by the US public increased by $4.2 billion - the largest dollar increase in history. A large part of that increase in debt was due to the federal deficit which was reported at $3.1 billion
- Over 39% of U.S. Federal debt is foreign-owned, though we earn more from our assets abroad than we pay to foreign investors
- The average American has over $90,000 in debt, and approximately 80% of Americans are in debt
What about on the state level?
As a result of snowballing debt, President Biden's $1.9T economic stimulus package promised $350B in direct aid to states.
To help understand the image, Texas is actually a great case study. Texas's bubble is big because it has one of the highest total debt levels, but is green because its debt ratio is pretty good at 62.5%.
California has the highest total debt, but is very light pink, stating that its debt ratio isn't bad. Some states' liabilities outweigh their assets by a factor of 4x or 5x which is scary.
This is a helpful illustration of the delicate balance of taking on debt. It's okay to take on large amounts of debt if you have a reasonable belief that revenue outstrips interest. To contrast that, some of these states have unsustainable debt levels - and only survive because they're a part of a bigger whole - the U.S. - and have an extra safety net.
What about Consumer Debt?
Most of America's debt is Federal - but consumer debt accounts for a non-trivial portion as well. Here's a chart that shows the change in U.S. Household debt since 2003.
Federal Reserve Bank of NY via HowMuch
Student, Auto, and Home Owner loans have all increased substantially - with the cost of student loans raising over 500%. Almost every category of consumer debt has increased.
While our country has gotten richer, and the standard of living has increased, we also have more people living in large amounts of debt.
Things To Consider
These charts are startling. Debt is a powerful tool ... but comes with risk as well. The question is, are we as a country and individuals managing the risk appropriately?
It's hard to look at these charts and say that there isn't an issue. The hope is that the government stimulus packages will make a difference - but Band-Aids won't fix the root of the problem and can even lull people into a false sense of security.
What do you think the solution is?
Is Cryptocurrency Here to Stay?
I've always been a fan of Blockchain, but I've always been a bit more cautious of cryptocurrencies.
Blockchain is the technology foundation behind cryptocurrencies and an important enabling technology for the next generation of technological innovation.
This week Coinbase went public at an astronomical valuation. They were backed by venture capital firms like Andreessen Horowitz and Union Square Ventures.
This makes sense to me because the VCs were able to capitalize on the "Fear of Missing Out" and "Animal Spirits" driving the market without the concentration risk of a particular cryptocurrency. In a sense, it is the same reason I am bullish on Blockchain itself.
Making sense of cryptocurrencies, however, is tougher for me to justify. There are over 1000 currencies out there – and the list is growing. But valuation isn't really about first-mover advantages or features ... You also must consider government policies and regulations and a host of other issues.
Consequently, it's hard to recommend putting money in any coin as an investment.
Speculating (or "trading") is a different conversation.
Clearly, there is a lot of money being made and lost ... but how much of those gains and losses can be attributed to luck and how much to skill? A better question is ... If you traded cryptocurrencies, how much of your gains or losses would be due to luck versus skill?
For the past few years, it felt as if the buzz had died down a little. Despite that, Bitcoin prices and many other cryptocurrencies continued to increase in value - though with much more volatility than normal investments.
This week, Dogecoin (a cryptocurrency that started as a meme) jumped from $.07 a coin to $.35 a coin, capitalizing on press and support from Elon Musk. But it's not the only cryptocurrency doing well.
via How Much
A lot of the jump in the price of many coins recently coincided with the GameStop trading surge and was likely driven by the sentiment of those same retail traders.
Crypto's are interesting, in part, because they're a digital currency decentralized over a peer-to-peer network.
The more people are willing to accept it as a medium of exchange, the more valuable it becomes (and the more it becomes a stable store of value).
Supposedly, decentralization provides it safety from censorship and government interference - meaning it has value as an international currency, and as a currency for black-market transactions. But, in my opinion, that remains to be seen (and I consider it unlikely for most cryptocurrencies).
However, the worth of a Bitcoin clearly isn't just based on sentiment (on one hand, there are desires to avoid fiat currency vagaries, government interventions and scrutiny, while having a fair price discovery method, etc. ... on the other hand, there are also the costs to mine a Bitcoin, transaction fees, etc. and crypto has recently been under fire for its huge environmental impact).
Compared to a reserve currency – whose worth is primarily influenced by trade value and other macroeconomic factors - watching crypto's volatility can be scary.
That being said, as adoption increases and more businesses enable it, it's possible that it will continue to legitimize. For the time being, I remain a long-term skeptic because there is too much working against it.
For an extra laugh, here's a still relevant video from 2017 on why you should invest all your money in Bitcoin.
via AwakenWithJP
Posted at 07:44 PM in Business, Current Affairs, Gadgets, Ideas, Market Commentary, Science, Trading, Trading Tools, Web/Tech | Permalink | Comments (0)
Reblog (0)