There are numerous ways to look at or measure the global economy (including trade blocs, big industry movers, or debt). Another way to get a global overview is to compare GDP.
When trading was slower and more deeply tied to an investor mindset, economics played a more significant role in fundamental analysis. As the holding period (or "time in trade") shrinks, there is less focus on predicting markets over the long term ... and more on determining which techniques are making money now.
Even though markets are not the same as the economy, on a macro scale, many believe that it is possible to create value by understanding and the global economy better.
With that, take a look at the $94 trillion world economy, divided by region.
via visualcapitalist
Some thoughts:
- Global GDP was $87 trillion in 2019 and $84 trillion in 2020. So, while COVID did negatively impact GDP initially, it has rebounded and risen again as if 2020 hadn't interrupted the trend.
- Since 2018, China has been slowly gaining ground on the U.S.'s lead
- Global GDP isn't zero-sum, so countries doing better doesn't necessarily mean other countries are doing worse
- The top four countries - U.S., China, Japan, and Germany - make up over half of the world's GDP.
- Based on GDP growth, Libya, Guyana, Macao, the Maldives, and Ireland have the world's fastest-growing economies.
To put these numbers in perspective, the world economy was approximately $3 trillion in 1970, and GDP is estimated to double again by 2050.
Crazy stuff.
Betting On The Super Bowl
Trying to get rich quickly? Want to know if the markets going to be bull or bear this year?
Look no further than the "Super Bowl Indicator".
The theory is a Super Bowl win for a team from the AFC foretells a decline in the stock market and a win for the NFC means the stock market will rise in the coming year.
There is one big caveat ... it counts the Pittsburgh Steelers as NFC because that's where they got their start.
If you accept that caveat, it has been on the money 33 years out of 41 - an 80% success rate. Sounds good, right?
Come on ... you know better.
Here are some other "fun" stock market fallacies:
Back to Reality
Rationally, we understand that football and the stock market have nothing in common. And we probably intuitively understand that correlation ≠ causation. Yet, we crave order and look for signs that make markets seem a little bit more predictable.
The problem with randomness is that it can appear meaningful.
Wall Street is, unfortunately, inundated with theories that attempt to predict the performance of the stock market and the economy. The only difference between this and other theories is that we openly recognize the ridiculousness of this indicator.
More people than you would hope, or guess, attempt to forecast the market based on gut, ancient wisdom, and prayers.
While hope and prayer are good things ... they aren’t good trading strategies..
As goofy as it sounds, some of these "far-fetched" theories perform better than professional money managers with immense capital, research teams, and decades of experience.
I have a thought experiment I often ask people that come into my office.
What percentage of active managers beat the S&P 500 any given year?
... Now, what percentage beat the S&P 500 over 15 years?
The answer is about 5% as of 2019 (and that's in a predominantly bull market), and I have to imagine it's only gotten worse in the past two years. That's significantly worse than chance. That means something they're doing is hurting, not helping.
via Gaping Void
There's simply too much information out there for us to digest, process, rank, and use appropriately.
Every second you spend looking at a market is a second wasted.
There are people beating the markets — not by using the Super Bowl Indicator ... they're doing it with more algorithms and better technology.
There will never be less data or slower markets.
Onwards.
Posted at 01:51 PM in Business, Current Affairs, Games, Ideas, Market Commentary, Science, Trading, Trading Tools, Web/Tech | Permalink | Comments (0)
Reblog (0)