Trying to get rich quickly? Want to know if the markets going to be bull or bear this year?
Look no further than the "Super Bowl Indicator".
The theory is a Super Bowl win for a team from the AFC foretells a decline in the stock market and a win for the NFC means the stock market will rise in the coming year.
There is one big caveat ... it counts the Pittsburgh Steelers as NFC because that's where they got their start.
If you accept that caveat, it has been on the money 33 years out of 41 - an 80% success rate. Sounds good, right?
Come on ... you know better.
Here are some other "fun" stock market fallacies:
- January Indicator
- Aspirin Count Theory
- Hemline Indicator
- Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Indicator
- Men's Underwear Index
- Big Mac Index
Back to Reality
Rationally, we understand that football and the stock market have nothing in common. And we probably intuitively understand that correlation ≠ causation. Yet, we crave order and look for signs that make markets seem a little bit more predictable.
The problem with randomness is that it can appear meaningful.
Wall Street is, unfortunately, inundated with theories that attempt to predict the performance of the stock market and the economy. The only difference between this and other theories is that we openly recognize the ridiculousness of this indicator.
More people than you would hope, or guess, attempt to forecast the market based on gut, ancient wisdom, and prayers.
While hope and prayer are good things ... they aren’t good trading strategies..
As goofy as it sounds, some of these "far-fetched" theories perform better than professional money managers with immense capital, research teams, and decades of experience.
I have a thought experiment I often ask people that come into my office.
What percentage of active managers beat the S&P 500 any given year?
... Now, what percentage beat the S&P 500 over 15 years?
The answer is about 5% as of 2019 (and that's in a predominantly bull market), and I have to imagine it's only gotten worse in the past two years. That's significantly worse than chance. That means something they're doing is hurting, not helping.
via Gaping Void
There's simply too much information out there for us to digest, process, rank, and use appropriately.
Every second you spend looking at a market is a second wasted.
There are people beating the markets — not by using the Super Bowl Indicator ... they're doing it with more algorithms and better technology.
There will never be less data or slower markets.
Onwards.
How Markets Performed in 2021
2020 was a roller coaster of volatility, and while 2021 was as well, most asset classes saw improvements as the world reopened.
But it wasn't all smooth sailing. There were significant supply chain struggles and rising inflation ... not to mention the rising cases of COVID.
Regardless, markets are not the economy, and while there are numerous factors to think about, I've always found markets interesting.
2021 was a year of rampant speculation, in part because so many systematic traders underperformed. For example, Renaissance reportedly saw ~15 billion in outflows last year (despite double-digit returns) as their clients likely moved towards more "exciting" opportunities.
Of course, some of those "exciting" opportunities were cryptocurrency-related. Moreover, chasing performance like that is often mean-reverting. Yet, I've seen a massive increase in interest among various business groups in crypto, Web 3.0, and the Blockchain.
Cryptocurrencies
While crypto generally performed well in 2021, 2022 has seen a drop that erased over $1 trillion in value.
The reality is that crypto markets matured a lot in 2021. The thousands of coins are mostly a distraction, but there are many interesting coins from various sectors with interesting technology behind them. There is increased infrastructure and decreased correlation between coins. Unfortunately, not enough to keep this drop from affecting the whole space.
So the question is, is this a "discount" for people to buy into the space, or a sign of future troubles?
It's no secret that I've always been a fan of Blockchain but cautious of cryptocurrencies.
I think there is a lot of money to be made speculating in cryptocurrencies, but how much of that money being made is attributed to luck vs. skill?
Crypto's are interesting, in part, because they're a digital currency decentralized over a peer-to-peer network.
The more people are willing to accept it as a medium of exchange, the more valuable it becomes (and the more it becomes a stable store of value).
Supposedly, decentralization provides it safety from censorship and government interference - meaning it has value as an international currency and as a currency for black-market transactions. But, in my opinion, that remains to be seen (and I consider it unlikely for most cryptocurrencies).
However, the worth of a Bitcoin isn't just based on sentiment (on one hand, there are desires to avoid fiat currency vagaries, government interventions, and scrutiny, while having a fair price discovery method, etc. ... on the other hand, there are also the costs to mine a Bitcoin, transaction fees, etc. and crypto has recently been under fire for its huge environmental impact).
Compared to a reserve currency – whose worth is primarily influenced by trade value and other macroeconomic factors - watching crypto's volatility can be scary.
That being said, as adoption increases and more businesses enable it, it's possible that it will continue to legitimize. For the time being, I remain a long-term skeptic because there is too much working against it.
Many of my initial complaints are centered on coins as currency. I get that there are already many interesting uses of Blockchain that will also help to bring credibility to coins as a store of value.
The question for me is, even if cryptocurrency is here to stay long-term (and avoids government control), which coins will it be? Do they even exist today?
I'm positive there is money to be made related to the Blockchain, NFTs, and cryptocurrencies. But, at this point, it's a speculators game, and I think the best way to capitalize on this trend sustainably is to sell picks and shovels for the gold rush, instead of trying to stumble upon gold.
Posted at 10:50 PM in Business, Current Affairs, Ideas, Market Commentary, Science, Trading, Trading Tools | Permalink | Comments (0)
Reblog (0)