I've always been a fan of Blockchain, but I've always been a bit more cautious of cryptocurrencies.
Blockchain is the technology foundation behind cryptocurrencies and an important enabling technology for the next generation of technological innovation.
This makes sense to me because the VCs were able to capitalize on the "Fear of Missing Out" and "Animal Spirits" driving the market without the concentration risk of a particular cryptocurrency. In a sense, it is the same reason I am bullish on Blockchain itself.
Making sense of cryptocurrencies, however, is tougher for me to justify. There are over 1000 currencies out there – and the list is growing. But valuation isn't really about first-mover advantages or features ... You also must consider government policies and regulations and a host of other issues.
Consequently, it's hard to recommend putting money in any coin as an investment.
Speculating (or "trading") is a different conversation.
Clearly, there is a lot of money being made and lost ... but how much of those gains and losses can be attributed to luck and how much to skill? A better question is ... If you traded cryptocurrencies, how much of your gains or losses would be due to luck versus skill?
For the past few years, it felt as if the buzz had died down a little. Despite that, Bitcoin prices and many other cryptocurrencies continued to increase in value - though with much more volatility than normal investments.
This week, Dogecoin (a cryptocurrency that started as a meme) jumped from $.07 a coin to $.35 a coin, capitalizing on press and support from Elon Musk. But it's not the only cryptocurrency doing well.
A lot of the jump in the price of many coins recently coincided with the GameStop trading surge and was likely driven by the sentiment of those same retail traders.
Crypto's are interesting, in part, because they're a digital currency decentralized over a peer-to-peer network.
The more people are willing to accept it as a medium of exchange, the more valuable it becomes (and the more it becomes a stable store of value).
Supposedly, decentralization provides it safety from censorship and government interference - meaning it has value as an international currency, and as a currency for black-market transactions. But, in my opinion, that remains to be seen (and I consider it unlikely for most cryptocurrencies).
Compared to a reserve currency – whose worth is primarily influenced by trade value and other macroeconomic factors - watching crypto's volatility can be scary.
That being said, as adoption increases and more businesses enable it, it's possible that it will continue to legitimize. For the time being, I remain a long-term skeptic because there is too much working against it.
For an extra laugh, here's a still relevant video from 2017 on why you should invest all your money in Bitcoin.
I've always been a fan of Blockchain, but I've always been a bit more cautious of cryptocurrencies.
Blockchain is the technology foundation behind cryptocurrencies and an important enabling technology for the next generation of technological innovation.
This makes sense to me because the VCs were able to capitalize on the "Fear of Missing Out" and "Animal Spirits" driving the market without the concentration risk of a particular cryptocurrency. In a sense, it is the same reason I am bullish on Blockchain itself.
Making sense of cryptocurrencies, however, is tougher for me to justify. There are over 1000 currencies out there – and the list is growing. But valuation isn't really about first-mover advantages or features ... You also must consider government policies and regulations and a host of other issues.
Consequently, it's hard to recommend putting money in any coin as an investment.
Speculating (or "trading") is a different conversation.
Clearly, there is a lot of money being made and lost ... but how much of those gains and losses can be attributed to luck and how much to skill? A better question is ... If you traded cryptocurrencies, how much of your gains or losses would be due to luck versus skill?
For the past few years, it felt as if the buzz had died down a little. Despite that, Bitcoin prices and many other cryptocurrencies continued to increase in value - though with much more volatility than normal investments.
This week, Dogecoin (a cryptocurrency that started as a meme) jumped from $.07 a coin to $.35 a coin, capitalizing on press and support from Elon Musk. But it's not the only cryptocurrency doing well.
A lot of the jump in the price of many coins recently coincided with the GameStop trading surge and was likely driven by the sentiment of those same retail traders.
Crypto's are interesting, in part, because they're a digital currency decentralized over a peer-to-peer network.
The more people are willing to accept it as a medium of exchange, the more valuable it becomes (and the more it becomes a stable store of value).
Supposedly, decentralization provides it safety from censorship and government interference - meaning it has value as an international currency, and as a currency for black-market transactions. But, in my opinion, that remains to be seen (and I consider it unlikely for most cryptocurrencies).
Compared to a reserve currency – whose worth is primarily influenced by trade value and other macroeconomic factors - watching crypto's volatility can be scary.
That being said, as adoption increases and more businesses enable it, it's possible that it will continue to legitimize. For the time being, I remain a long-term skeptic because there is too much working against it.
For an extra laugh, here's a still relevant video from 2017 on why you should invest all your money in Bitcoin.
Is Cryptocurrency Here to Stay?
I've always been a fan of Blockchain, but I've always been a bit more cautious of cryptocurrencies.
Blockchain is the technology foundation behind cryptocurrencies and an important enabling technology for the next generation of technological innovation.
This week Coinbase went public at an astronomical valuation. They were backed by venture capital firms like Andreessen Horowitz and Union Square Ventures.
This makes sense to me because the VCs were able to capitalize on the "Fear of Missing Out" and "Animal Spirits" driving the market without the concentration risk of a particular cryptocurrency. In a sense, it is the same reason I am bullish on Blockchain itself.
Making sense of cryptocurrencies, however, is tougher for me to justify. There are over 1000 currencies out there – and the list is growing. But valuation isn't really about first-mover advantages or features ... You also must consider government policies and regulations and a host of other issues.
Consequently, it's hard to recommend putting money in any coin as an investment.
Speculating (or "trading") is a different conversation.
Clearly, there is a lot of money being made and lost ... but how much of those gains and losses can be attributed to luck and how much to skill? A better question is ... If you traded cryptocurrencies, how much of your gains or losses would be due to luck versus skill?
For the past few years, it felt as if the buzz had died down a little. Despite that, Bitcoin prices and many other cryptocurrencies continued to increase in value - though with much more volatility than normal investments.
This week, Dogecoin (a cryptocurrency that started as a meme) jumped from $.07 a coin to $.35 a coin, capitalizing on press and support from Elon Musk. But it's not the only cryptocurrency doing well.
via How Much
A lot of the jump in the price of many coins recently coincided with the GameStop trading surge and was likely driven by the sentiment of those same retail traders.
Crypto's are interesting, in part, because they're a digital currency decentralized over a peer-to-peer network.
The more people are willing to accept it as a medium of exchange, the more valuable it becomes (and the more it becomes a stable store of value).
Supposedly, decentralization provides it safety from censorship and government interference - meaning it has value as an international currency, and as a currency for black-market transactions. But, in my opinion, that remains to be seen (and I consider it unlikely for most cryptocurrencies).
However, the worth of a Bitcoin clearly isn't just based on sentiment (on one hand, there are desires to avoid fiat currency vagaries, government interventions and scrutiny, while having a fair price discovery method, etc. ... on the other hand, there are also the costs to mine a Bitcoin, transaction fees, etc. and crypto has recently been under fire for its huge environmental impact).
Compared to a reserve currency – whose worth is primarily influenced by trade value and other macroeconomic factors - watching crypto's volatility can be scary.
That being said, as adoption increases and more businesses enable it, it's possible that it will continue to legitimize. For the time being, I remain a long-term skeptic because there is too much working against it.
For an extra laugh, here's a still relevant video from 2017 on why you should invest all your money in Bitcoin.
via AwakenWithJP
Posted at 07:44 PM in Business, Current Affairs, Gadgets, Ideas, Market Commentary, Science, Trading, Trading Tools, Web/Tech | Permalink
Reblog (0)