Market Commentary

  • The Bulls May Be Hiding – But the Bears Are Hibernating

    Despite some early selling, the Bears were not committed their positions – and prices held up well again last week. Going into the long Memorial Day weekend, it didn't make much sense for Bears to press their bets without a selling catalyst.

    Still, the mood seems 'gloomy'. 

    The S&P 500 is down less than 3% from its recent closing high.  Nevertheless, based on the latest sentiment figures from the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII), you would think a lot more damage had been done.  Bespoke reports that Bullish Sentiment is at its lowest level since August 2010, and a far cry from the 60%+ levels we saw as recently as February. 

     

    110529 AAII Bullish Sentiment from Bespoke

    If you have contrarian instincts, you've got to be bullish right now.  Remember, a few bulls is enough to push things higher if there are even fewer bears willing to press their bets.

     

    110529 Bears Sleeping A Public Service Reminder From the Bear's Den.

    Of course, not everyone is a contrarian.  Some see smoke and warn of fire. 

    With that in mind, here is a list of the 7 major risks David Rosenberg sees brewing:

    1. China hard landing (PMI down to 51, perilously close to contraction mode)…equity market may have begun to price in some probability of such.
    2. Contagion sovereign credit risks in Europe (the rating agencies have already begun to take action against Spain, Italy and Belgium).
    3. Countertrend rally in the US dollar – this is crushing the risk-on carry trades: the unwinding of net speculative short positions in the dollar and long positions in the Euro seem to have further to go based on the latest CFTC data.
    4. Deepening recession in Japan – still one of the world’s largest economies; spill-over on global production schedules still to be felt.
    5. US fiscal policy is becoming more radically austere at all levels of government.
    6. The end of QE2 will be a very big deal given the 89% correlation between the Fed’s balance sheet and the movements in the S&P 500 over the past two years.
    7. US leading economic indicators are rolling over.  The Conference Board Index fell in April for the first time since June 2010; the coincident-to-lagging indicator is down three months in a row; and the ECRI smoothed index is down now for four straight weeks, a streak last seen in July 2010.

    Source: Gluskin Sheff (with a hat tip to Pragmatic Capitalism)

    Enhanced by Zemanta
  • The Bulls May Be Hiding – But the Bears Are Hibernating

    Despite some early selling, the Bears were not committed their positions – and prices held up well again last week. Going into the long Memorial Day weekend, it didn't make much sense for Bears to press their bets without a selling catalyst.

    Still, the mood seems 'gloomy'. 

    The S&P 500 is down less than 3% from its recent closing high.  Nevertheless, based on the latest sentiment figures from the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII), you would think a lot more damage had been done.  Bespoke reports that Bullish Sentiment is at its lowest level since August 2010, and a far cry from the 60%+ levels we saw as recently as February. 

     

    110529 AAII Bullish Sentiment from Bespoke

    If you have contrarian instincts, you've got to be bullish right now.  Remember, a few bulls is enough to push things higher if there are even fewer bears willing to press their bets.

     

    110529 Bears Sleeping A Public Service Reminder From the Bear's Den.

    Of course, not everyone is a contrarian.  Some see smoke and warn of fire. 

    With that in mind, here is a list of the 7 major risks David Rosenberg sees brewing:

    1. China hard landing (PMI down to 51, perilously close to contraction mode)…equity market may have begun to price in some probability of such.
    2. Contagion sovereign credit risks in Europe (the rating agencies have already begun to take action against Spain, Italy and Belgium).
    3. Countertrend rally in the US dollar – this is crushing the risk-on carry trades: the unwinding of net speculative short positions in the dollar and long positions in the Euro seem to have further to go based on the latest CFTC data.
    4. Deepening recession in Japan – still one of the world’s largest economies; spill-over on global production schedules still to be felt.
    5. US fiscal policy is becoming more radically austere at all levels of government.
    6. The end of QE2 will be a very big deal given the 89% correlation between the Fed’s balance sheet and the movements in the S&P 500 over the past two years.
    7. US leading economic indicators are rolling over.  The Conference Board Index fell in April for the first time since June 2010; the coincident-to-lagging indicator is down three months in a row; and the ECRI smoothed index is down now for four straight weeks, a streak last seen in July 2010.

    Source: Gluskin Sheff (with a hat tip to Pragmatic Capitalism)

    Enhanced by Zemanta
  • A Look at the Market: So Much Seems Changed, But Has It?

    Image representing LinkedIn as depicted in Cru...Image via CrunchBase

    Pundits are calling for a new tech bubble

    IPOs are going off at the top of their ranges.  LinkedIn now has the highest Price/Revenue ratio of any company, anywhere.  At LinkedIn's valuation, Apple would be worth over $3 Trillion dollars.

    So, clearly all is well in the financial world.  Right?

    The Canary in the Coal Mine?

    Greek stocks tumbled to new 14-year lows last week, as Greek bond yields rocketed to new all-time highs.

    The risk premium says something.

    110522 Greek Bond Yeild Risk Premiums

    The Daily Reckoning asks why investors are fleeing Greek stocks and bonds faster than a chambermaid flees an IMF Director’s hotel room? 

    With tongue-in-cheek (and based on 'exhaustive' research), they conclude that investors prefer the securities of solvent entities over those of insolvent entities. But note investors cannot always differentiate correctly between solvent and insolvent.

    So, will a worsening sovereign debt crisis in Europe harsh our mellow? 

    Have the underlying conditions really changed?

    Enhanced by Zemanta
  • A Look at the Market: So Much Seems Changed, But Has It?

    Image representing LinkedIn as depicted in Cru...Image via CrunchBase

    Pundits are calling for a new tech bubble

    IPOs are going off at the top of their ranges.  LinkedIn now has the highest Price/Revenue ratio of any company, anywhere.  At LinkedIn's valuation, Apple would be worth over $3 Trillion dollars.

    So, clearly all is well in the financial world.  Right?

    The Canary in the Coal Mine?

    Greek stocks tumbled to new 14-year lows last week, as Greek bond yields rocketed to new all-time highs.

    The risk premium says something.

    110522 Greek Bond Yeild Risk Premiums

    The Daily Reckoning asks why investors are fleeing Greek stocks and bonds faster than a chambermaid flees an IMF Director’s hotel room? 

    With tongue-in-cheek (and based on 'exhaustive' research), they conclude that investors prefer the securities of solvent entities over those of insolvent entities. But note investors cannot always differentiate correctly between solvent and insolvent.

    So, will a worsening sovereign debt crisis in Europe harsh our mellow? 

    Have the underlying conditions really changed?

    Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Here a Few Links for Your Weekend Reading

    These are a few of the links that caught my eye.

    Business Posts Moving the Markets that I Found Interesting This Week:

    • De-Bunking Economic Facts: The Crisis Suggests a Staggering Lack of Knowledge. (BW)
    • Doug Kass' Still Timely Contrarian Reminder. (TheStreet & Minyanville)
    • Starbucks CEO, Howard Schultz, Says "The Commodity Rally Is Fake". (PragCap
    • Number-Crunchers Crunched: Uses & Abuses of Models. (Economist)
    • BRIC Wall: Is China's GDP Growth-Per-Head About to Slow Down? (Economist & FT)
    • More Posts Moving the Markets.

    Lighter Ideas and Fun Links that I Found Interesting This Week

  • Here a Few Links for Your Weekend Reading

    These are a few of the links that caught my eye.

    Business Posts Moving the Markets that I Found Interesting This Week:

    • De-Bunking Economic Facts: The Crisis Suggests a Staggering Lack of Knowledge. (BW)
    • Doug Kass' Still Timely Contrarian Reminder. (TheStreet & Minyanville)
    • Starbucks CEO, Howard Schultz, Says "The Commodity Rally Is Fake". (PragCap
    • Number-Crunchers Crunched: Uses & Abuses of Models. (Economist)
    • BRIC Wall: Is China's GDP Growth-Per-Head About to Slow Down? (Economist & FT)
    • More Posts Moving the Markets.

    Lighter Ideas and Fun Links that I Found Interesting This Week

  • Using the Inflation Rate as a Trading Filter

    Wouldn't it be great if a simple number told you whether it was safe to bet on the market going higher?

    Crossing Wall Street posted a chart that suggests the stock market does very well when the monthly inflation rate is under an annualized rate of 5.3%.  Conversely, the market has done poorly in months when inflation is above that 5.3% annualized level.  The chart shows the the monthly return above and below that level of inflation.

    110522 Stock Market Returns and Inflation
    The data goes back to 1871; and it is surprising how well this relationship has held up over 140 years. During this period, monthly inflation has been above the 5.3% annualized level about one-third of the time.

    Historically, when inflation was below 5.3%, the stock market has had an annualized after-inflation gain of 9.59%. And when inflation was above 5.3%, then the stock market has had an annualized loss of 8.15%.
     
    Did Inflation Cause Returns to Change?
     
    Computers are great at finding the optimal point for a system to trade based on historical data.  Technical traders call this "curve-fitting", and have learned to be wary of coincident variables being confused as causal variables.  That is a fancy way of saying that the relationship between inflation levels and stock market returns might be a great way to "describe" what happened; however, it doesn't prove that the inflation level "caused" the returns to go up or down. It also doesn't prove that inflation didn't cause the returns.
     
    Nonetheless, 140 years is a long time sample … and inflation rates affect people reasonably uniformly … and the stock market can be looked at as collective measure of the fear and greed of the population.  So, using the inflation rate as a trading filter seems to be a reasonable idea worthy of further testing.  What do you think?
     
    With many market watchers expecting the inflation rate to rise, this is something to consider.
     
    Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Using the Inflation Rate as a Trading Filter

    Wouldn't it be great if a simple number told you whether it was safe to bet on the market going higher?

    Crossing Wall Street posted a chart that suggests the stock market does very well when the monthly inflation rate is under an annualized rate of 5.3%.  Conversely, the market has done poorly in months when inflation is above that 5.3% annualized level.  The chart shows the the monthly return above and below that level of inflation.

    110522 Stock Market Returns and Inflation
    The data goes back to 1871; and it is surprising how well this relationship has held up over 140 years. During this period, monthly inflation has been above the 5.3% annualized level about one-third of the time.

    Historically, when inflation was below 5.3%, the stock market has had an annualized after-inflation gain of 9.59%. And when inflation was above 5.3%, then the stock market has had an annualized loss of 8.15%.
     
    Did Inflation Cause Returns to Change?
     
    Computers are great at finding the optimal point for a system to trade based on historical data.  Technical traders call this "curve-fitting", and have learned to be wary of coincident variables being confused as causal variables.  That is a fancy way of saying that the relationship between inflation levels and stock market returns might be a great way to "describe" what happened; however, it doesn't prove that the inflation level "caused" the returns to go up or down. It also doesn't prove that inflation didn't cause the returns.
     
    Nonetheless, 140 years is a long time sample … and inflation rates affect people reasonably uniformly … and the stock market can be looked at as collective measure of the fear and greed of the population.  So, using the inflation rate as a trading filter seems to be a reasonable idea worthy of further testing.  What do you think?
     
    With many market watchers expecting the inflation rate to rise, this is something to consider.
     
    Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Here a Few Links for Your Weekend Reading Enjoyment

    I'm going to my son's graduation from Duke University this weekend.

     

    110513 Graduation Time

    Business Posts Moving the Markets that I Found Interesting This Week:

    • Does Venture Capital Data Show Signs Of Bubble? (Fortune)
    • Zogby Say 37% of Americans in Job Paying Less than Before. (TheDaily)
    • Krugman Warns Several Key Indicators Flashing Yellow (NYTimes)
    • Keynes And Hayek Square Off For Round Two of Economist Rap Battle (VIDEO) (HuffingtonPost)
    • Bullishness Waning: This Huge Contrarian Signal Might Send Stocks Higher. (BusinessInsider)
    • More Posts Moving the Markets.

    Lighter Ideas and Fun Links that I Found Interesting This Week

  • Here a Few Links for Your Weekend Reading Enjoyment

    I'm going to my son's graduation from Duke University this weekend.

     

    110513 Graduation Time

    Business Posts Moving the Markets that I Found Interesting This Week:

    • Does Venture Capital Data Show Signs Of Bubble? (Fortune)
    • Zogby Say 37% of Americans in Job Paying Less than Before. (TheDaily)
    • Krugman Warns Several Key Indicators Flashing Yellow (NYTimes)
    • Keynes And Hayek Square Off For Round Two of Economist Rap Battle (VIDEO) (HuffingtonPost)
    • Bullishness Waning: This Huge Contrarian Signal Might Send Stocks Higher. (BusinessInsider)
    • More Posts Moving the Markets.

    Lighter Ideas and Fun Links that I Found Interesting This Week