admin

This was an interesting week in the Markets. Most of the major indices broke above their 50-day moving averages, only to come back down.

It won’t take much to throw a scare into the markets at this point in time. Consumer confidence and retail investor sentiment are both incredibly bearish – which is actually a bullish sign for most sophisticated investors.

The chart below shows a monthly view of the S&P 500 with an interesting look at RSI.  I found it at Headline Charts, which is another blog I enjoy reading. 

This is what intermediate bottoms are made from. As the panic builds this time, realize that the weakest holders have already sold. There may be a panic spike coming; but the downward momentum isn’t as strong. This is where positive divergences start to show-up. And each time this level holds it becomes stronger support.  The trick here, of course, is for that level to hold.

What, Me Worry?   According to the NYTimes, the White House is seeking new Fed power to keep markets stable. On Monday, the Bush administration plans to propose broad new authority for the Federal Reserve to oversee market stability, possibly exposing Wall Street firms to greater scrutiny, but avoiding a call for tighter regulation. Is that supposed to make the markets feel better?

This was an interesting week in the Markets. Most of the major indices broke above their 50-day moving averages, only to come back down.

It won’t take much to throw a scare into the markets at this point in time. Consumer confidence and retail investor sentiment are both incredibly bearish – which is actually a bullish sign for most sophisticated investors.

The chart below shows a monthly view of the S&P 500 with an interesting look at RSI.  I found it at Headline Charts, which is another blog I enjoy reading. 

This is what intermediate bottoms are made from. As the panic builds this time, realize that the weakest holders have already sold. There may be a panic spike coming; but the downward momentum isn’t as strong. This is where positive divergences start to show-up. And each time this level holds it becomes stronger support.  The trick here, of course, is for that level to hold.

What, Me Worry?   According to the NYTimes, the White House is seeking new Fed power to keep markets stable. On Monday, the Bush administration plans to propose broad new authority for the Federal Reserve to oversee market stability, possibly exposing Wall Street firms to greater scrutiny, but avoiding a call for tighter regulation. Is that supposed to make the markets feel better?

I thought that the Fed jumped in at a very appropriate time, this time. Panic was everywhere.

Moreover, I like the fact that they have not simply been reducing rates. We’re seeing a new form of global coordination with economic allies and novel approaches to serve as a catalyst for stable and growing markets. I know that is not a popular stance. 

• The 25-plus-year trend in the S&P index was in danger of being broken;
• Bear Stearns was about to fail; and
• We were about to break through the January intraday lows.

I don’t know about you, but as these things happened, I sensed that a cascading series of bad events could take the market down much further than where we currently stand.

graphic from FT

Sentiment has been so bearish and fear has been so pervasive, that
my sense is that people were looking for a reason to get out of the
Markets to avoid an apocalypse. Believe or not, that’s the fuel needed
for the next big up-move in the market.

We’ve been seeing extraordinary levels of fear. It doesn’t matter which
sentiment indicator you look at, we’re seeing readings that have only
been seen at market bottoms of a significant degree. Yet, sentiment is a secondary indicator. Price is primary.

This brings me to another good sign in the markets this week. While I
would stop short of calling what happened in the broader markets
"capitulation" – in my opinion, capitulation-selling happened in many
of the financial stocks. Specifically, take a look at Lehman (LEH),
Goldman Sachs (GS), and MF Global (MF). Each of these stocks lost
incredible amounts of money and came back. This is a very good sign.

In my experience, big volatility (like we’ve seen recently) is followed by much smaller volatility.  My sense is that as long as the line in the sand on the S&P holds, then we’ll see an intermediate move upwards without too much scariness for the time being. That’s going out on a limb because we’re really not much different than where we were at the end of last week. Yet there is a difference, in the battle between bulls and bears, for the moment, it looks like the bulls have a little bit of momentum.

I thought that the Fed jumped in at a very appropriate time, this time. Panic was everywhere.

Moreover, I like the fact that they have not simply been reducing rates. We’re seeing a new form of global coordination with economic allies and novel approaches to serve as a catalyst for stable and growing markets. I know that is not a popular stance. 

• The 25-plus-year trend in the S&P index was in danger of being broken;
• Bear Stearns was about to fail; and
• We were about to break through the January intraday lows.

I don’t know about you, but as these things happened, I sensed that a cascading series of bad events could take the market down much further than where we currently stand.

graphic from FT

Sentiment has been so bearish and fear has been so pervasive, that
my sense is that people were looking for a reason to get out of the
Markets to avoid an apocalypse. Believe or not, that’s the fuel needed
for the next big up-move in the market.

We’ve been seeing extraordinary levels of fear. It doesn’t matter which
sentiment indicator you look at, we’re seeing readings that have only
been seen at market bottoms of a significant degree. Yet, sentiment is a secondary indicator. Price is primary.

This brings me to another good sign in the markets this week. While I
would stop short of calling what happened in the broader markets
"capitulation" – in my opinion, capitulation-selling happened in many
of the financial stocks. Specifically, take a look at Lehman (LEH),
Goldman Sachs (GS), and MF Global (MF). Each of these stocks lost
incredible amounts of money and came back. This is a very good sign.

In my experience, big volatility (like we’ve seen recently) is followed by much smaller volatility.  My sense is that as long as the line in the sand on the S&P holds, then we’ll see an intermediate move upwards without too much scariness for the time being. That’s going out on a limb because we’re really not much different than where we were at the end of last week. Yet there is a difference, in the battle between bulls and bears, for the moment, it looks like the bulls have a little bit of momentum.

Despite Tuesday’s huge rally, equities were mostly flat for the week, with the S&P 500 losing 0.4%. Nonetheless, it is a good sign that the Market held recent lows despite a flood of bad news and bearish sentiment.

There is a saying that "it is not the news that matters, it is the reaction to the news." Normally, I would have considered last week’s performance by the Market to be quite bullish. However, we were faced with two big news items during the weekend.

First, Bear Stearns reached an agreement to sell itself to JPMorgan Chase for $2 a share in a stock-swap transaction. Second, the Fed announced two initiatives designed to bolster market liquidity and promote orderly market functioning.

In a bull market, these might be interpreted as bullish (or at least cause a bunch of short-covering). However, we are not in a bull market and I am waiting to see the "reaction" to this news. Expect to hear rumors of other banks in trouble too.

With regard to the sale of Bear, let’s be clear, this was not a bailout; it was an orderly liquidation. For context, Bear’s market value went from $20BB (in January, last year) to $3.5BB on Friday – and the sale to JPMorgan was at just $236MM (millions, not billions).

Remember, because of Good Friday, there are only four trading days this week. Also the FOMC meets on Tuesday, and will announce whether it will continue to cut interest rates. So, I’m expecting an interesting week.

Despite Tuesday’s huge rally, equities were mostly flat for the week, with the S&P 500 losing 0.4%. Nonetheless, it is a good sign that the Market held recent lows despite a flood of bad news and bearish sentiment.

There is a saying that "it is not the news that matters, it is the reaction to the news." Normally, I would have considered last week’s performance by the Market to be quite bullish. However, we were faced with two big news items during the weekend.

First, Bear Stearns reached an agreement to sell itself to JPMorgan Chase for $2 a share in a stock-swap transaction. Second, the Fed announced two initiatives designed to bolster market liquidity and promote orderly market functioning.

In a bull market, these might be interpreted as bullish (or at least cause a bunch of short-covering). However, we are not in a bull market and I am waiting to see the "reaction" to this news. Expect to hear rumors of other banks in trouble too.

With regard to the sale of Bear, let’s be clear, this was not a bailout; it was an orderly liquidation. For context, Bear’s market value went from $20BB (in January, last year) to $3.5BB on Friday – and the sale to JPMorgan was at just $236MM (millions, not billions).

Remember, because of Good Friday, there are only four trading days this week. Also the FOMC meets on Tuesday, and will announce whether it will continue to cut interest rates. So, I’m expecting an interesting week.